A few things I’m building

    Curiosity, put to work.

    Products, open standards, and experiments. Each starts with a question about how people learn, build, or work with AI.

    01

    SayMakeLearning · Product & engineering

    A place to become a builder.

    AI-supported maker studio where young people build, test, explain, and improve projects.

    Status: Private preview
    Web App
    Visit saymake.app (opens in a new tab)
    Evidence & project status

    Checked 14 October 2026

    Problem
    AI tools can do the thinking for kids.
    What I built
    A maker studio. Kids choose, build, test, and explain a project. The AI coaches. It does not build for them.
    Status
    No learner results published yet. Still unproven whether learners can show the skill without the AI.
    Earlier capture of the SayMake maker studio
    02

    OMBSLearning · Open standards

    What does it mean to build well?

    Open Making and Building Standard: a draft, openly licensed standard describing the practices of making and building across K–12.

    Status: Experiment
    Open Source
    Read the draft standard (opens in a new tab)
    Evidence & project status

    Checked 28 October 2026

    The public repository and README describe draft v0.3.0, open for community review. Source access does not establish adoption, learning outcomes, or a validated assessment.

    03

    ReviewFlowAI tools · Human review

    AI suggestions. Human decisions.

    An experimental local review app: a model proposes labels, a person reviews and corrects them, and exports keep each decision, reason, and source.

    Status: Experiment
    Open Source
    View source (opens in a new tab)
    Evidence & project status

    Checked 14 October 2026

    Problem
    Model proposals are suggestions, not ground truth.
    What I built
    A local review app. A model proposes labels. A person reviews and corrects them. Exports keep each decision, reason, and source.
    Status
    Public repo has setup and verification results; demo data is simulated. No real human benchmark yet.
    04

    SPEARAI security · Open source

    Trust, checked at the boundary.

    Secure Prompt Enforcement At Runtime: open-source LLM security middleware with a red-team evaluation harness.

    Status: Experiment
    Open Source
    View source (opens in a new tab)
    Evidence & project status

    Checked 9 October 2026

    Problem
    AI app security is often asserted, not inspected.
    What I built
    Open-source LLM security middleware with a red-team evaluation harness.
    Status
    Public repo shows source, README, and evaluation method. Live models, new attacks, real integrations, output leakage, and latency remain unchecked.
    Earlier capture of the SPEAR repository and evaluation documentation
    05

    CuePersonal AI · Product & engineering

    An assistant for the everyday.

    A personal AI assistant built around Sunny's own daily workflow.

    Status: Experiment
    Web App
    See archive entry
    Evidence & project status

    Not checked yet

    Problem
    Handing parts of my own daily work to an AI assistant.
    What I built
    A personal AI assistant built around my own daily workflow.
    Status
    Local tests in my own workflow only. Not verified outside it.
    Earlier capture of the Cue personal assistant experiment

    The wider picture

    There’s more in the making.

    Earlier projects

    The full archive includes Voice101, Puddle, and earlier explorations, with their status and limitations.

    Browse the archive

    Frameworks & open standards

    Practical ways to examine what works, what someone understands, and what still needs testing.

    Explore the thinking

    Technical advisory

    Helping build and launch an affordable, competency-based approach to applied AI education.

    Discuss a collaboration

    Get in touch

    Reach out for advising, collaboration, speaking, or build opportunities.